이 글은 아직 해당 언어를 지원하지 않아 영어 버전을 표시합니다.
Practice review: compliance traps in employing overseas staff remotely
Hiring overseas talent as 'freelancers' can trigger permanent-establishment and labor-law risk. Reviewing the common pitfalls.
Remote work makes cross-border hiring easy — and lays new compliance traps. A typical mistake is paying long-term, full-time overseas staff as 'contractors', assuming it sidesteps local labor law.
The risk has two layers: locally they may be reclassified as employees, bringing social-security, tax, and dismissal-protection duties; and their ongoing activity may create a 'permanent establishment', triggering corporate income tax.
The review's point: cross-border staffing must be designed on both 'how to employ lawfully' and 'how to pay lawfully'; common solutions include a local entity, an employer of record (EOR), or a compliant contracting arrangement.
The lesson: choose the employment model based on the role's nature and local rules, not merely payment convenience.