이 글은 아직 해당 언어를 지원하지 않아 영어 버전을 표시합니다.
Compliance basics for RAG: retrieval augmentation isn't a free pass
Feeding enterprise data into an LLM for retrieval augmentation lifts accuracy — and brings data compliance, access control, and logging along with it.
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) reduces hallucination and improves relevance by grounding on your own knowledge base, but it also means the output depends directly on the data you feed in — where it came from, who may see it, and whether it contains personal information all become compliance questions.
Three risks recur: sensitive or personal data that should never be retrieved slips into the knowledge base; per-user permission boundaries aren't enforced at the retrieval layer, exposing data across users; and there's no record of what the model saw and answered.
The pragmatic approach is to push access control and data classification into the retrieval layer, mask or isolate sensitive fields, and keep auditable retrieval and generation logs. RAG makes answers more accurate; it does not reduce the compliance duty.